RFI vs sources sought
Both are market research, but the center of gravity differs
FAR Part 10 frames market research as a way for agencies to understand sources, commercial availability, practices, and acquisition options. RFIs and sources sought notices both fit that world.
An RFI often asks for information, comments, or industry feedback. A sources sought notice often focuses on identifying capable sources.
Do not paste the same response into both
For an RFI, answer the questions and make useful comments. For sources sought, prove relevant capability and business status when requested. If the notice combines both, organize the response so each ask is answered cleanly.
Track the follow-on as a capture asset
The response itself is only part of the value. Save the notice, buyer, scope terms, NAICS, PSC, likely timing, and any response you sent. That record helps when the solicitation appears later.
What this looks like in practice
ExampleSame program, two different asks
An RFI might ask vendors whether the draft technical approach is realistic. A sources sought notice for the same program might ask whether small businesses have relevant experience and capacity. Both matter, but the response emphasis is different.
Frequently asked questions
Is a sources sought notice an RFI?
They can overlap, but sources sought usually focuses more directly on identifying capable sources.
Should I send past performance?
For sources sought, usually yes when requested. For RFIs, send it when it directly supports the questions asked.
Can either lead to a set-aside?
Market research can inform set-aside decisions, especially when capable small businesses respond clearly.