Best fitDavis-Baconstate match
TX20260195 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Texas • Briscoe, Collingsworth
23 occupation rates available in the full WD.
Requet for Proposals for Auditing Services on Behalf of thje Education Savings Account Program
Solicitation: Not available
Notice ID: 607992d9c64d013529fe09058deb8a15
Department • State of TexasState • TXPosted • —Due • No due date postedBid range • $316,256 - $374,822
Contract snapshot
Federal opportunity from State of Texas. Place of performance: TX.
- Source
- Open on official portal →
- Solicitation
- 607992d9c64d013529fe09058deb8a15
- Performance
- TX
- Response
- No due date posted
Live POP
Place of performance
TX
Contracting office
Not listed
Point of Contact
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
State of Texas
Agency
Not available
Subagency
Not available
Office
Not available
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 21 more rate previews.↓
View more WD detail
3 more WD matches and 21 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
TX20260195 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Texas • Briscoe, Collingsworth
Rate
Base $33.23Fringe $7.52
Rate
Base $33.17Fringe $24.92
Rate
Base $28.57Fringe $9.30
+20 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
TX20260152 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Texas • Harrison
Rate
Base $33.23Fringe $7.52
Rate
Base $33.17Fringe $24.92
Rate
Base $28.26Fringe $8.13
+21 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
TX20260212 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Texas • La Salle, McMullen
Rate
Base $30.50Fringe $8.89
Rate
Base $33.17Fringe $24.92
Rate
Base $27.95Fringe $8.03
+20 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
TX20260070 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Texas • Bosque
Rate
Base $10.80Fringe $0.26
Rate
Base $12.50Fringe $0.00
Rate
Base $14.25Fringe $0.00
+4 more occupation rates in this WD
Description
Federal opportunity from State of Texas. Place of performance: TX.
Advisory bid range
Pricing and bid posture
$316,256 - $374,822
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
Floor
$316,256
Target
$334,663
Premium
$374,822
Labor
$167,120
Direct
$15,500
Burden
$112,136
Fee + reserve
$39,442
Target $334,663Hybrid workpaper with explicit assumptions4 modeled rows
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$1,708,105,474
Sector total $1,708,105,474 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$101,550
P10–P90
$28,349–$3,400,257
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($1,708,105,474)
Deal sizing
$101,550 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
No public attachments surfaced yet. Some owner portals gate files behind registration, and BidPulsar keeps enriching the package as new public links appear.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
low confidencegpt 5.2
The State of Texas has posted a “Requet for Proposals for Auditing Services on Behalf of thje Education Savings Account Program.” Based on the notice title, this is a professional services procurement focused on providing auditing services supporting the Education Savings Account (ESA) program. The opportunity brief does not include a solicitation number, due date, attachments, or any statement of work, so the bid/no-bid decision should be gated on obtaining the full RFP package and confirming audit scope and standards. If your firm has public-sector program audit experience and the capacity to meet Texas-state contracting and reporting expectations, this could be a strong fit once details are confirmed.
auditing serviceseducation savings account programESA program auditState of Texas auditprogram auditcompliance auditfinancial auditinternal controls
What the buyer is trying to do
Select a contractor to provide auditing services in support of the Education Savings Account Program for the State of Texas.
Who should pursue this
- CPA firms with demonstrated experience performing audits for state government programs in Texas
- Firms with specific experience auditing education benefit programs or savings account/benefit disbursement programs (ESA-like programs)
- Firms able to scale for program-wide audit coverage (scope to be confirmed when the RFP is obtained)
Work breakdown
- Provide auditing services for the Education Savings Account (ESA) Program (specific audit types, scope, and standards not provided in the brief)
- Coordinate with the State of Texas program stakeholders (specific office not identified in the brief)
- Deliver audit reports and any required supporting documentation (deliverable formats and cadence not provided in the brief)
Response package checklist
- Complete RFP response addressing auditing services for the Education Savings Account Program (requires full RFP package; not included in the brief)
- Firm qualifications highlighting relevant state program audit experience and ESA/education program familiarity
- Audit approach and workplan aligned to the program’s objectives (cannot be finalized until scope/standards are known)
- Key personnel resumes and licenses/credentials (e.g., CPA) applicable to audit work
- Past performance references for similar public-sector auditing engagements
- Quality control/peer review information relevant to audit services (if requested in the RFP)
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
Compliance notes
- The opportunity brief does not provide solicitation number, response deadline, place of performance, or attachments—obtain the official RFP documents before committing to a compliance matrix.
Pricing strategy
- Hold pricing until the RFP clarifies audit scope (e.g., number of accounts/entities, audit cycles, required testing) and pricing structure (hourly rates vs fixed fee vs not-to-exceed).
- Be prepared to price optional or incremental audit work if the RFP includes add-on tasks (not indicated in the brief).
Teaming and subs
- Consider teaming with a Texas-local CPA/audit firm if you lack in-state presence and the RFP favors local availability (not confirmed in the brief).
- If the RFP includes program integrity, data analytics, or IT controls testing, consider a specialized subcontractor for data/IT audit support (scope not provided in the brief).
Risks and watchouts
- Insufficient information risk: the brief lacks the actual scope of auditing services, standards, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.
- Schedule risk: posted date and response deadline are missing, which could compress proposal preparation once the RFP is obtained.
- Program sensitivity risk: audits tied to an Education Savings Account Program may involve high visibility and strict compliance expectations; confirm independence and conflict-of-interest requirements once the RFP is available.
Smart questions to ask
- Can the State of Texas provide the full RFP package (statement of work, evaluation criteria, submission instructions, and all attachments) for “Auditing Services on behalf of the Education Savings Account Program”?
- What audit standards and reporting requirements apply (e.g., specific governmental auditing standards, internal control reporting, agreed-upon procedures)?
- What is the audit scope (population size, entities/accounts covered, time period, and required sampling/testing)?
- What deliverables are required (report types, frequency, presentation to stakeholders) and in what formats?
- What is the anticipated contract period and any option years (not provided in the brief)?
- Are there independence, conflict-of-interest, or prior-vendor restrictions for firms that may also serve ESA participants or administrators?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Full RFP documents/attachments (scope, instructions, evaluation criteria)
- Solicitation number
- Response deadline
- Posted date
- Statement of work / required audit standards
- Deliverables and reporting cadence
- Period of performance
- Place of performance / required on-site presence
Federal Bid Partners
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Need help writing this bid?
Route this notice into proposal, compliance, and submission support without burying the solicitation record.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.