F16_AN_APG_68_NSN_1270_01_396_3088_PN_783R300G01
Sources Sought from DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE • DEPT OF DEFENSE. Place of performance: OK. Response deadline: Dec 30, 2027.
- Source
- Open on SAM.gov →
- Solicitation
- F16_AN_APG_68_NSN_1270_01_396_3088_PN_783R300G01
- Performance
- S Coffeyville, Oklahoma • 73145 United States
- Response
- Dec 30, 2027, 05:00 AM UTC
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 41 more rate previews.↓
Description
REPAIR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NSN: 1270-01-396-3088
P/N: 783R300G01
Noun: Advanced Programmable Signal Processor
Application: AN/APG-68 Radar, F-16 C/D Aircraft
2 Jun 2020 Section C 1/3
SECTION C:
1. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE SATISFIED TO BECOME A QUALIFIED SOURCE
a. Prequalification Notice: The offeror shall notify the appropriate government Small Business Office or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in the appropriate government contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Advanced Programmable Signal Processor.
b. Facilities, Testing, and Inspection Capabilities: The offeror must certify to the government that they have, or have access to, the required facilities and equipment to repair, inspect, test, package, and store the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.
c. Data Verification: The offeror must verify that they have a complete data package. This verification must include a complete list of all procedures, drawings, and specifications, including change notices, in the offeror’s possession including, at a minimum Northrop Grumman (97942) drawing 783R300. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications. Note, not all information can be provided.
d. Repair Process Verification: The offeror must repair this item to conform to the government requirements as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by 416 SCMS/GUEAA. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes.
e. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification: The offeror, at their own expense, shall prepare and submit to 416 SCMS/GUEAA for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements identified by Drawing 783R300. The government retains the right to exercise the option to inspect the testing processes, including on-site witnessing of any or all documented testing. To allow accomplishing this, the offeror shall notify the government at least 30 days in advance of the occurrence of any testing that will be used as a basis for qualification. The offeror’s facilities shall be made available for government inspection during these tests.
REPAIR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NSN: 1270-01-396-3088
P/N: 783R300G01
Noun: Advanced Programmable Signal Processor
Application: AN/APG-68 Radar, F-16 C/D Aircraft
2 Jun 2020 Section C 2/3
f. Qualification Article Verification: This requirement is waived for this article, because a
qualification article cannot be provided.
g. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation,
which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified are $76,000.00.
h. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity
that completion of this qualification effort should require 1400 days. This is based on
complexity of the Advanced Programmable Signal Processor and other factors.
i. Qualification Time Limitation: An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have
considered an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can
meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed
to provide the vendor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards
specified in this qualification requirement.
j. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified: The offeror must be fully qualified in order to
be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements
stated, in writing, in the qualification requirement before the date specified for award of the
contract. Once all requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved repair source
for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.
REPAIR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NSN: 1270-01-396-3088
P/N: 783R300G01
Noun: Advanced Programmable Signal Processor
Application: AN/APG-68 Radar, F-16 C/D Aircraft
2 Jun 2020 Section C 3/3
2. SOURCE QUALIFICATION WAIVER REQUIREMENTS
Sources who meet any of the following Source Qualification Waiver Criteria (QWC) may apply for a waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify production capability:
a. QWC1: The potential source submits written certification that the articles have been supplied to the government or original equipment manufacturer (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Purchase Order invoice, etc).
b. QWC2: A source qualified to provide an assembly is usually qualified to provide subassemblies, major components, and items of that assembly.
c. QWC3: A source qualified to provide earlier dash numbers of a basic P/N may be qualified to provide other dash numbers of that same basic P/N, provided there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other relevant requirements.
d. QWC4: A source qualified to provide a similar or like item can be qualified to provide the required item. However, for approval, the engineering authority must verify that there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other requirements over that of the similar item. At a minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written proof, such as purchase orders, shipping documents, etc., to show that the similar item was provided to the original equipment manufacturer or DoD.
e. QWC5: A source previously qualified to provide an item, but which has been purchased, sold, merged, absorbed, reformed, split, etc., may qualify if it can be established that the qualification is currently with the requester and that the requester has the same or equivalent facilities, tooling, equipment, personnel, and utilizes the original forging, castings, etc., in the repair process.
Pricing and bid posture
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
This Sources Sought notice from the Department of the Air Force seeks qualified sources for the repair of the Advanced Programmable Signal Processor (NSN: 1270-01-396-3088, P/N: 783R300G01) used in the AN/APG-68 Radar for F-16 C/D Aircraft. Offers must satisfy extensive qualification requirements, including certification of facilities, data verification, and submission of detailed testing procedures. Estimated costs for qualification testing are around $76,000, with a projected qualification timeline of 1400 days, showing the complexity involved in this effort.
The buyer is seeking to establish a list of approved sources capable of repairing the Advanced Programmable Signal Processor for F-16 C/D Aircraft, ensuring compliance with strict government standards and detailed evaluation processes.
- Companies with experience in aerospace repair and testing.
- Firms with certifications and facilities to perform extensive component repairs.
- Organizations that have previous contracts with the Department of Defense related to similar equipment.
- Identify and certify facilities for inspection and testing.
- Prepare a complete data package including relevant documentation and drawings.
- Create and submit a qualification test plan for government review.
- Conduct testing and provide documentation of results to demonstrate compliance.
- Submit a qualification cost estimate and time completion estimate.
- Certification of facilities and testing capabilities.
- Complete data package with all relevant drawings.
- Qualification test plan detailing compliance procedures.
- Documentation of previous experience with similar repairs.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Must comply with UID requirements as per DFARS 211.274.
- All testing must be approved by 416 SCMS/GUEAA in advance.
- Documentation must demonstrate compliance with performance, environmental, and quality assurance standards.
- Factor in an estimated qualification cost of $76,000 for testing and evaluation.
- Consider additional costs for materials and potential facility upgrades.
- Partner with established aerospace manufacturers for shared capabilities.
- Consider teaming with firms that have prior experience with the AN/APG-68 radar system.
- High cost of qualification testing may deter participation.
- Complex application of verification processes could result in delays.
- Inability to meet qualification requirements could lead to disqualification from future contracts.
- What specific facilities are deemed necessary for compliance?
- Are there any prior qualified sources that could influence competitive landscape?
- What is the government's timeline for reviews and approvals during the qualification process?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Detailed specifications for the testing facilities required.
- Specific locations or additional requirements for on-site inspections.
- Clarification on any changes in qualification requirements after 2027.
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Other matched support routes↓
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.