Fair Hearing Officer RFR
Federal opportunity from Massachusetts Commission for the Blind. Place of performance: MA. Response deadline: Jun 30, 2027.
- Source
- Open on official portal →
- Solicitation
- BD-19-1065-MCB1-1-33481
- Performance
- MA
- Response
- Jun 30, 2027, 05:00 PM UTC
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 5 more rate previews.↓
Description
This Fair Hearing Officer RFR is being reissued so it can continue to accept responses.
Pricing and bid posture
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
MCB Finance has reissued the “Fair Hearing Officer RFR” to continue accepting responses, indicating an ongoing/rolling intake rather than a one-time solicitation event. The current response deadline shown is 2027-06-30 17:00:00+00:00, so bidders should verify whether this is a long-open RFR or an administrative placeholder for continuous submissions. The classification provided is UNSPSC 80-12-00, which signals a professional services-type buy, but the brief contains no scope, deliverables, or qualification criteria. Given the lack of documents/links and no attachments, the primary next step is to obtain the full RFR package and confirm submission mechanics before investing in a full proposal effort.
Maintain an active pool of qualified Fair Hearing Officer respondents by reissuing the RFR so submissions can continue to be accepted (i.e., sustain capacity/coverage for fair hearing officer services).
- Individuals or firms that can provide Fair Hearing Officer services and can demonstrate directly relevant adjudicatory/hearing officer experience.
- Teams with an existing bench of qualified hearing officers if the reissued RFR is intended to keep a roster active.
- Confirm how MCB Finance is using this reissued RFR (continuous qualification, roster, or contract award).
- Review/obtain the full RFR instructions and any required forms (none provided in the brief).
- Prepare respondent qualifications for Fair Hearing Officer work (resume/CV, relevant hearing/administrative adjudication experience, writing sample(s) if required).
- Define availability/coverage approach if the RFR expects a bench of officers (regions, capacity, scheduling).
- Complete and submit the response through the buyer’s designated system/channel by the stated deadline (2027-06-30 17:00:00+00:00), once confirmed.
- Completed response per the reissued Fair Hearing Officer RFR instructions (not included in the brief).
- Credentialing package for proposed Fair Hearing Officer(s) (e.g., CV/resume(s), relevant experience summary) as required by the RFR.
- Any mandatory Commonwealth/agency forms, attestations, or certifications referenced in the RFR (not included in the brief).
- Submission confirmation showing timely receipt ahead of 2027-06-30 17:00:00+00:00.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Set-aside field indicates “SBPP Eligible: NO”; do not plan on SBPP preference/eligibility as part of the bid strategy.
- Because this is explicitly a reissue to continue accepting responses, confirm whether responses are evaluated continuously and whether/when awards are made.
- No pricing model, rate structure, or cost basis is provided in the brief; confirm from the full RFR whether pricing is hourly, per-hearing, per-diem, or another basis before developing rates.
- If the RFR is roster-based, clarify whether pricing is collected at qualification time or later at tasking time.
- If the RFR allows multiple officers, consider teaming with additional qualified hearing officers to increase coverage/capacity.
- If the RFR requires specialized domain knowledge (not stated in the brief), identify SMEs or advisors accordingly once the full RFR is obtained.
- Scope risk: the brief contains no description of duties, required qualifications, caseload expectations, or deliverables beyond the title; bidding without the full RFR invites noncompliance.
- Administrative risk: posted_date, solicitation number, and submission pathway are absent; confirm you are using the correct/current reissued RFR record and submission instructions.
- Timeline risk: the 2027-06-30 deadline may indicate a long-open intake; confirm evaluation/award cadence so effort aligns with opportunity timing.
- Can you provide the full reissued Fair Hearing Officer RFR package (instructions, scope of services, evaluation criteria, required forms)?
- Is this reissued RFR a continuous/rolling intake to maintain a qualified roster, and how often are responses reviewed and awards made?
- What are the minimum qualifications/credentialing requirements for Fair Hearing Officers under this RFR?
- What is the expected pricing structure (hourly/per-hearing/per-diem) and are there any rate caps or required rate sheets?
- What is the submission method and confirmation process (portal/location/email), since no links/attachments are present in the notice record?
- What is the anticipated place of performance (remote vs. in-person) and any geographic coverage expectations?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- Full RFR package (scope, qualifications, evaluation criteria, required forms)
- Submission method/portal link and buyer website
- Solicitation number and notice type
- Posted date and any Q&A/communications process
- Place of performance and remote/in-person expectations
- Period of performance dates and award/renewal structure
- Pricing instructions (rate format, caps, invoicing basis)
- Whether this is a roster/qualification process versus an immediate contract award
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Other matched support routes↓
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.