Best fitDavis-Baconstate match
MA20260018 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Essex
24 occupation rates available in the full WD.
RFP-Approved Court Transcribers Ref: BD-17-1107-1107T-SUP01-11433
Solicitation: BD-19-1107-1107T-SUP01-34634
Notice ID: ma_commbuys_6b902ea22ebfdc003153
Department • Trial CourtState • MAPosted • —Due • Feb 27, 2027, 03:00 PM UTC• Closes in 277 daysBid range • $316,256 - $374,822
Contract snapshot
Federal opportunity from Trial Court. Place of performance: MA. Response deadline: Feb 27, 2027.
- Source
- Open on official portal →
- Solicitation
- BD-19-1107-1107T-SUP01-34634
- Performance
- MA
- Response
- Feb 27, 2027, 03:00 PM UTC
Live POP
Place of performance
MA
Contracting office
Not listed
Point of Contact
Name
Derek Doherty
Email
Not available
Phone
Not available
Agency & Office
Department
Trial Court
Agency
Not available
Subagency
Not available
Office
Derek Doherty
Contracting Office Address
Not available
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 22 more rate previews.↓
View more WD detail
3 more WD matches and 22 more rate previews.
Davis-BaconBest fitstate match
MA20260018 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Essex
Rate
Base $50.10Fringe $31.45
Rate
Base $66.17Fringe $37.08
Rate
Base $57.18Fringe $33.70
+21 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260023 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Plymouth
Rate
Base $50.10Fringe $31.45
Rate
Base $57.18Fringe $33.70
Rate
Base $57.83Fringe $33.70
+23 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260017 (Rev 1)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Bristol
Rate
Base $66.17Fringe $37.08
Rate
Base $57.18Fringe $33.70
Rate
Base $57.83Fringe $33.70
+22 more occupation rates in this WD
Davis-Baconstate match
MA20260006 (Rev 2)Published May 18, 2026Massachusetts • Barnstable, Berkshire, Bristol +11
Rate
Base $30.86Fringe $14.15
Rate
Base $37.15Fringe $14.57
Rate
Base $38.38Fringe $14.66
+4 more occupation rates in this WD
Description
RFP-Approved Court Transcribers Ref: BD-17-1107-1107T-SUP01-11433
Advisory bid range
Pricing and bid posture
$316,256 - $374,822
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
Floor
$316,256
Target
$334,663
Premium
$374,822
Labor
$167,120
Direct
$15,500
Burden
$112,136
Fee + reserve
$39,442
Target $334,663Hybrid workpaper with explicit assumptions4 modeled rows
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
12-month awarded value
$3,515,334,796
Sector total $3,515,334,796 • Share 100.0%
Live
Median
$350,000
P10–P90
$32,216–$3,347,126
Volatility
Volatile200%
Market composition
NAICS share of sector
A simple concentration signal, not a forecast.
100.0%
share
Momentum (last 3 vs prior 3 buckets)
+100%($3,515,334,796)
Deal sizing
$350,000 median
Use as a pricing centerline.
Live signal is computed from awarded notices already observed in the system.
Signals shown are descriptive of observed awards; not a forecast.
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
No public attachments surfaced yet. Some owner portals gate files behind registration, and BidPulsar keeps enriching the package as new public links appear.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
Updated: Feb 21, 2026
Client-ready brief
Executive summary
high confidencegpt 4o mini
The RFP for Approved Court Transcribers seeks qualified vendors to provide transcription services for the Trial Court, specifically referenced as BD-17-1107-1107T-SUP01-11433. This opportunity is open until February 27, 2027, inviting proposals from firms that meet the necessary compliance standards. Interested bidders should have experience in court transcription and familiarity with the expected reporting standards for accuracy and timeliness.
Court TranscriptionRFPTrial CourtComplianceTranscription Services
What the buyer is trying to do
The buyer, the Trial Court - OCM DNU, aims to procure reliable court transcription services that adhere to established guidelines and enhance courtroom efficiency.
Who should pursue this
- Companies with expertise in court transcription
- Vendors with a history of compliance in government contracts
- Firms that can provide scalable transcription solutions
Work breakdown
- Understanding transcription requirements
- Preparing documentation according to RFP standards
- Submitting technical and pricing proposals by the deadline
- Ensuring compliance with applicable standards
- Implementing quality control measures for accuracy
Response package checklist
- Technical proposal addressing all requirements
- Pricing model for services offered
- Past performance references
- Compliance certifications
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
Compliance notes
- Vendors must adhere to judicial standards and protocols
- Submission of compliance documentation is essential
Pricing strategy
- Consider a competitive yet sustainable pricing model
- Ensure pricing aligns with service quality and turnaround time
Teaming and subs
- Partner with established court reporting firms to enhance credibility
- Engage technology firms for transcription software solutions
Risks and watchouts
- Potential for increased competition as the deadline approaches
- Need to maintain high accuracy to avoid liability issues
- Changes in transcription requirements during the proposal evaluation period
Smart questions to ask
- What are the specific volume expectations for transcription services?
- What benchmarks are used for evaluating performance?
- Are there preferred technologies or formats for transcription submissions?
Source coverage notes
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- No specific guidelines for pricing structure provided
- Details on number of expected transcription hours not mentioned
- No information on performance metrics or evaluation criteria
- Absence of contact information for buyer clarification
- Lack of clarity on subcontracting possibilities
- No firm details on preferred technology requirements
- Missing specifics on training or onboarding processes
- No information on post-award evaluation standards
Federal Bid Partners
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Need help writing this bid?
Route this notice into proposal, compliance, and submission support without burying the solicitation record.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.