Workplace eLearning and Training Platform Solution- UPDATED
Federal opportunity from Central Procurement Office • Tennessee Department of General Services. Place of performance: TN.
- Source
- Open on official portal →
- Solicitation
- tn_cpo__RFI 31701-03819
- Performance
- TN
- Response
- No due date posted
Point of Contact
Agency & Office
Applicable wage determinations
Best public WD match for the notice location and scope.
View more WD detail3 more WD matches and 7 more rate previews.↓
Description
1 STATE O F TENNESSEE
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, S TRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY S OLUTIONS
REQUEST F OR INFORMATION
FOR
WORKPLACE eLEARNING AND TRAINING PLATFORM
SOLUTION
RFI # 31701-0 3819
JANUARY 27, 2026
1.S
TATEMENT OF PURPOSE:
The State of Tennessee, Finance and Administration, Strategic Technology Solutions (STS)
issues this Request for Information (“RFI”) for the purpose of identifying quality workplace creator
platform solutions designed to support digital l earning delivery , training, development, content
creation and skill development addres sing the needs of varying agenc ies across the State . We
appreciate your input and participation in this process .
T
his RFI seeks information to help the State:
•Identify available marketplace solutions and emerging technologies.
•Understand platform capabilities, licensing models, security controls, and integrati on
r
equirements.
•Assess solutions that support both centralized and decentralized training functions.
2.BACKG
ROUND:
The State of Tennessee supports a diverse workforce with varying training needs . Current
eLearning and training platforms vary by agency . The State is exploring modern platforms that
enable both technical (e.g., IT software) and non -technical creators (e.g., program staff, HR,
training coordinators) to build, manage, publish, and measure digital learning content efficientlyand securely.
3.COMMUNICATIONS :
3.
1. Please submit your questions and response to this RFI to:
Shannon Keefe, Contract Specialist
Finance and Administration, Strategic Technology Solutions
901 Rep. John Lewis Way North, Nashville, TN 37243
(615) 35
0-4244
Shannon.Keefe@tn.gov
3.
2. Please reference RFI # 31701- 03819 with all communications to this RFI.
2
3.3. Please limit all questions to one submission per vendor.
4. RFI SCHEDULE OF EVENTS:
EVENT
TIME
(Central
Time
Zone)
DATE
(all dates are State business
days)
1. RFI Issued Tuesday , January 27 , 2026
2. Written Questions & Comments Deadline 2:00 PM Wednesday , February 4, 2026
3.
State Response to Written Questions &
Comments
Thursday , February 12, 2026
4. RFI Response Deadline 2:00 PM Friday , February 20, 2026
5. GENERAL INFORMATION:
5.1. Please note that responding to this RFI is not a prerequisite for responding to any future solicitations related to this project and a response to this RFI will not create any contract
rights. Responses to this RFI will become property of the State.
5.2. The information gathered during this RFI is part of an ongoing procurement. In order to
prevent an unfair advantage among potential respondents, the RFI responses will not be available until after the completion of evaluation of any responses, proposals , or bids
resulting from a Request for Qualifications, Request for Proposals, Invitation to Bid or other procurement method. In the event that the state chooses not to go further in the
procurement process and responses are never evaluated, the responses t o the
procurement including the responses to the RFI, will be considered confidential by the State.
5.3. The State will not pay for any costs associated with responding to this RFI.
5.4. Any services or products proposed in this RFI, must be in compliance with the following security policy: all State data must remain in the United States, regardless of whether the data is processed, stored, in- transit, or at rest. Access to State data shall be limited to US -
based (onshore) resources only. Configuration or development of software and code is permitted outside of the United States, however, software applications designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned or controlled by, or subject to the
jurisdiction or direction of, a foreign adversary, which the U.S. Secretary of Commerce acting pursuant to 15 C.F.R. 7 has defined to include the People's Republic of China, among others are prohibited. Any testing of code outside of the United States must use fake
data. A copy of production data may not be transmitted or used outside the United States.
5.5. The State may request demo presentations from selected RFI respondents.
3
5.6. Responses should be prepared, with emphasis on completeness and clarity, and should
NOT exceed fifteen (15) pages total in length. Responses, as well as any reference material
presented, must be written in English, and must be written on standard 8 ½” x 11” pages
and all text must be at least a 12- point font. All pages must be numbered.
6. INFORMATIONAL FORM S:
The State is requesting the following informat ion from all interested parties. Please fill out the
following forms :
RFI #31701- 03819
TECHNICAL INFORMATIONAL FORM
1. RESPONDENT LEGAL ENTITY NAME:
2. RESPONDENT CONTACT PERSON:
Name, Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email:
3. Please provide a description of your company’s public sector experience providing eLearning and training content creation solutions, including implementation and ongoing support.
4. Proposed Solution(s): Please describe how your solution will satisfy the State’s List of
Business Requirements in Table 7.1 of this RFI , if there is a feature that doesn’t currently meet
the requirements, but is in development, or if your solution provides alternative functionality that may yield a similar outcome.
5. Provide a proposed overall project timeline to complete the State’s List of Business Requirements in Table 7 .1, inc luding phases, milestones, and State resource obligations.
Please include knowledge transfer, training, and post -implementation technical support into
your timeline.
6. Describe your solution’s software license/subscription framework , delivery requirements and
rules for transferring licenses/subscriptions.
7. Explain the use of AI with your solution and any limitations that might exist .
8. Do you currently have the capacity to migrate data from the Articulate 360 platform to your
solution? If so, please identify key risks you’ve encountered in similar transitions from Articulate 360 to your solution and how they were mitigated?
Please describe your solution’s transition approach, including tools , methods and/or support
that will be used for data extraction, transformation, and loading (ELT) , a transition timeline
describing key p hases and milestones and the overall transition training process.
9. Describe your solution’s training and knowledge transfer process to administrators and content
managers.
10. Explain your solution’s collaboration functionalit y, content management, mobile accessibility
and offline capabilities.
11. Describe your release management approach to system updates and improvement, including
SLAs and introduction of emerging technologies .
12. Explain all aspects of support for your solution, including online chat support, live support, etc.
4
13. Describe what methods, strategy, solutions, product features, etc ....set you apart from your
competition. What standards or best practices are met by your solution(s)?
14. Describe any risks and potential mitigation strategies associated with your solution that meets
the List of Business Requirements in Table 7 .1.
15. Through which public sector cooperative purchasing agreements can you currently provide these services? (GSA, NASPO, etc.)
16. Does your company offer an enterprise solution? If so, describe your approach to expanding to an enterprise solution.
COST INFORMATIONAL FORM
1. Describe the typical price range associated with your solution, including implementation, licensing, training, and support. Pricing should reflect an estimated current baseline of 150 licensed users.
Please provide a public -sector price list for your products and services.
2. If an enterprise solution is available, as requested in Section 6 : Informational Forms, Technical
Informational Form , Question 16 , describe any tiered pricing structure for licens ing,
implementation, training, or related services . Include enterprise- level pricing options as applicable.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. Please provide input on alternative approaches or additional things to consider that might benefit
the State:
7. PROPOSED SOLUTION (S) Requirements : The State is seeking information on software
solutions that currently exist from qualified vendors to mitigate the risk of data discrepancies by means of data cleansing solutions. Table 3.1 below represents the State’s List of Business Requirements for which the vendor should provide proposed solutions in their response.
Table 7 .1: List of Business Requirements
REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED RESPONSE
1. Content Authoring & Design Capabilities
a. Intuitive, no -code/low -code authoring tools
usable by non-technical staff
b. Support for multimedia content ( video,
audio, graphics , screen recording) with
transcriptions and access to an expansive
photo/media library
c. Interactive learning elements, including quizzes, assessments, scenarios, and
branching logic
d. Support for storyboards , layering,
animations, layout customization, and flexible block -based design
e. Font, color and branding customization,
including storage of logos, fonts, and color
hex values
5
f. Support for slide -based and page -based
course authoring, including timeline or
slide sequencing, slide duplication, and
slide-level navigation controls
g. Microlearning and modular content
creation and management
h. Ability to apply or decline live/ real-time
updates without requiring course republishing
i. Ability to auto- generate voice narration
from input text
j. Single sign -on support
2. Content Management, Collaboration & Governance
a. Collaborative content development across
agencies with role -based access
b. Centralized content repository for training
materials and shared assets
c. Reusable templates, standardized formats
and shared resource libraries accessible
directly within authoring environment
d. Version control and update tracking,
including change history and rollback
e. Review and approval workflows supporting
cross- agenc y governance, including inline
commenting, feedback resolution, and versioned review cycles
f. Ability to r educ e duplicative training efforts
through reuse and adaption of content
g. Capa bility to distribute standardized
content across multiple agencies
3. Learning Delivery , LMS & Tracking
a. Integration with existing LMS platforms OR
provision of a built -in LMS
b. Support for SCORM, xAPI, AICC , or
equivalent interoperability standards
c. Ability to assign courses to users and user
groups
d. Learner activi ty tracking, including course
progress, completions, assessments, and testing results
e. Reporting and analytics on completion, engagement, and performance
f. Automated generation and reporting of
course completion data at the user and
group level
g. Automated calculation, assignment ,
tracking and issuance of CPE/CPU credit s
for defined courses
4. Personalized & Accessible Learning
a. Support for p ersonalized learning paths
and role- based curricula
b. Skill development frameworks aligned to
workforce needs
6
c. Optional AI -driven learner guidance and
recommendations
d. Adaptive learning features based on
learner performance or behavior
e. Built-in ac cessibility features , including
responsive design for devices, to support
diverse learner needs
5. Enterprise Security , Compliance & Hosting
a. Compliance with government -grade
security standards (SOC 2, NIST, etc.)
b. Privacy and data protection controls
appropriate for public -sector use
c. Compliance with ADA / Section 508 and
WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards
d. Alignment with r ecords management and
retention requirements
e. Flexible hosting model options (cloud,
hybrid, on -prem)
7. Integration, Data Migration & Compatibility
a. Integration with existing agency system s
(e.g., IAM , ERP, CRM, Relias, analytics
platforms )
b. Ability to migrate historical and active data
from legacy systems
c. Assurance of data integrity, consistency,
compliance and data retention during
migration
d. Knowledge t ransfer plan and transition
support from legacy platforms to your
solution
Pricing and bid posture
Contractor-side estimate from visible notice metadata, NAICS/PSC, contract type, schedule hints, and BidPulsar workpaper assumptions. Not an IGCE, incumbent price, award value, or government budget.
This advisory bid range is visible page text for contractors and search engines: it summarizes the modeled floor, target, and premium bid posture for this solicitation.
Market snapshot
Baseline awarded-market signal across all contracting (sample of 400 recent awards; refreshed periodically).
Files
Files size/type shown when available.
BidPulsar Analysis
A practical, capture-style breakdown of fit, requirements, risks, and next steps.
The Central Procurement Office is seeking solutions for a Workplace eLearning and Training Platform, as outlined in RFI 31701-03819. The request has been updated, and interested vendors should review the related documents for specific requirements and changes. This opportunity presents a potential for innovative educational solutions suited for workplace environments.
The buyer aims to identify a suitable eLearning and training platform that can enhance workplace training efficiencies and accessibility for employees.
- Vendors with experience in eLearning technologies.
- Companies that provide custom training solutions.
- Firms with a track record of delivering workplace training platforms.
- Review RFI documents thoroughly to understand requirements and amendments.
- Develop a solution proposal that aligns with workplace training needs.
- Outline technological capabilities of the proposed platform.
- Demonstrate past performance in similar projects.
- Executive Summary of the proposal.
- Detailed project implementation plan.
- Technical specifications of the proposed platform.
- Commercial pricing structure for solutions.
More BidPulsar strategy notesCompliance, pricing, teaming, risks, questions, and coverage notes
- Ensure compliance with relevant accessibility standards.
- Consider state-specific eLearning regulations.
- Include adherence to data privacy laws.
- Consider a tiered pricing model based on user engagement.
- Calculate costs based on potential scalability of the platform.
- Benchmark pricing against similar solutions in the market.
- Partner with content creators in educational technology.
- Collaborate with IT firms for technical infrastructure support.
- Engage with instructional designers for content development.
- Potential competition from established eLearning providers.
- Rapid changes in technology affecting proposed solutions.
- Client budget constraints leading to reduced scope.
- What specific challenges does the current training environment face?
- What features are essential for the success of the platform?
- How will success be measured post-implementation?
Some notices publish limited source detail. Confirm these points before final bid/no-bid decisions.
- No specific deadline for submissions provided.
- No details on the evaluation criteria mentioned.
- Lack of clarity on the existing training challenges faced by the agency.
- No information on who the key decision-makers are.
- Absence of budget range for proposals.
Service match
Optional support routes matched to this notice after the core solicitation details.
Related hubs & trends
Navigate the lattice: hubs for browsing, trends for pricing signals.